1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 at 8:31 AM
|
5 |
From: "Tom Wijsman" <TomWij@g.o>
|
6 |
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
|
7 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower |
8 |
|
9 |
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 08:11:31 -0400
|
10 |
Dutch Ingraham <stoa@×××.us> wrote:
|
11 |
|
12 |
> [nomerge ] mate-base/mate-1.6.0::mate-overlay
|
13 |
|
14 |
You are still using the MATE overlay, which wasn't synced up with
|
15 |
the latest changes; make layman sync, but if you want to be really sure
|
16 |
just remove the overlay from layman and use MATE from the Portage tree.
|
17 |
|
18 |
> [ebuild N #] mate-base/mate-session-manager-1.6.1-r1::mate-overlay
|
19 |
> [ebuild N ] sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3
|
20 |
|
21 |
Don't mask MATE, it causes more blockers; mate-base/mate requires it.
|
22 |
|
23 |
As you can see above, your old checkout of the MATE overlay pulls in
|
24 |
sys-power/upower; the MATE in the portage tree doesn't do this as it
|
25 |
allows upower-pm-utils to satisfy this, I think this has also been
|
26 |
fixed up in the MATE overlay recently which a sync could solve.
|
27 |
|
28 |
> [blocks B ] sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration
|
29 |
> ("sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration" is blocking sys-fs/udev-212-r1)
|
30 |
> [blocks B ] sys-apps/systemd ("sys-apps/systemd" is blocking
|
31 |
> sys-fs/udev-212-r1)
|
32 |
> [blocks B ] sys-fs/udev ("sys-fs/udev" is blocking
|
33 |
> sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration-4, sys-apps/systemd-212-r5)
|
34 |
|
35 |
Fixing what was said above, for MATE (maybe XFCE too), will fix it ...
|
36 |
|
37 |
> (sys-apps/systemd-212-r5::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
|
38 |
> pulled in by
|
39 |
> >=sys-apps/systemd-200 required by
|
40 |
> (sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
|
41 |
|
42 |
... as well as this; this last thing points out that something is
|
43 |
still pulling in upower, that's due to the old MATE overlay checkout.
|
44 |
|
45 |
The MATE overlay plans to retire itself in less than a week from now.
|
46 |
|
47 |
https://github.com/Sabayon/mate-overlay/issues/76
|
48 |
|
49 |
If you need help with switching to MATE in the Portage tree, feel free
|
50 |
to let me know; this migration is supposed to go very fluent, so,
|
51 |
removing the overlay from layman should work out well.
|
52 |
|
53 |
--
|
54 |
With kind regards,
|
55 |
|
56 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
|
57 |
Gentoo Developer
|
58 |
|
59 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
|
60 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
|
61 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
62 |
|
63 |
|
64 |
|
65 |
Thanks, Tom. I have actually looked, ever since you began your work on the portage |
66 |
|
67 |
version of MATE, for some guidance on how to transfer from the overlay to the |
68 |
|
69 |
general portage repository, but, and maybe I just didn't look hard enough, I never |
70 |
|
71 |
found the proper guidance for making that switch. |
72 |
|
73 |
|
74 |
|
75 |
If you could point me to the proper command set to make the switch, I'd appreciate it. |
76 |
|
77 |
|
78 |
|
79 |
|
80 |
|