1 |
On Sun, 9 Dec 2012 15:23:28 -0800 |
2 |
Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > > It seems like ARM processors will destroy x86 before too long. |
5 |
> > > Does anyone think this won't happen? |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > - Grant |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Yes me. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > ARM will take over where it makes sense and won't where it doesn't. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > For desktops and laptops, x86 was used simply because there was |
14 |
> > nothing else, so x86 is going to have to fight for it's survival in |
15 |
> > the whole bottom and middle range there. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> And won't the manufacturers be more inclined to use a processor they |
18 |
> can manufacture themselves under license than buy one from Intel or |
19 |
> AMD? And won't end users be more inclined to buy them since they'll |
20 |
> be cheaper? |
21 |
|
22 |
You have neglected to mention the single most important factor |
23 |
of all: |
24 |
|
25 |
inertia |
26 |
|
27 |
Human groups are loathe to change things that already work good enough |
28 |
for something that works better. Intel works good enough. |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Alan McKinnon |
32 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |