| 1 |
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:54:40 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Bind mounts? I thought you would use btrfs subvolumes! |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Often the bind mounts point to btrfs subvolumes. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Yeah, I guess I could directly mount all those subvolumes, but I find |
| 9 |
> symlinks or bind mounts easier. The other factor is that if I have |
| 10 |
> unnecessary subvolumes then I'm having to manage snapshots across more |
| 11 |
> of them and my snapshots are less atomic, since snapshots don't cross |
| 12 |
> subvolume boundaries (which is something which ought to be |
| 13 |
> configurable). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I use a script to handle my snapshots, so snapshotting multiple |
| 16 |
subvolumes is less of an issue, but an option to snapshot a subvolume and |
| 17 |
all its children, or even the whole filesystem, would be nice. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Remember, it takes 47 muscles to frown |
| 24 |
And only 4 to pull the trigger of a sniper rifle.... |
Archives