Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Beau Henderson <beau@××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Constant Load 1.00+ on new Toshiba laptop
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:26:29
Message-Id: 955d685d0902171526j6f210fc8yb5c75d9b7e57cfd4@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Constant Load 1.00+ on new Toshiba laptop by podge@podgeweb.com
1 On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:56 AM, <podge@××××××××.com> wrote:
2
3 > On Wednesday 18 February 2009 09:20:22 Beau Henderson wrote:
4 > > G'day,
5 > >
6 > > I was wondering if anyone might have any idea's as to what is causing my
7 > > new Toshiba A300 Satelite to idle at a load of 1.00 when not in use.
8 > Right
9 > > after boot up it settles at 1.00 when I do nothing. I'm not seeing
10 > anything
11 > > out of ordinary in dmesg ( asside from an non issue with legacy usb and
12 > sd
13 > > and sr drivers in the kernel ).
14 > >
15 > > I had Ubuntu on this thing for a week or so as I needed something quick
16 > > fast when my workstation chipfan died on me and this wasn't an issue when
17 > I
18 > > had that installed so I think I can rule out hardware. Also, its not an
19 > > issue when I boot up via live cd ( sysrescuecd ).
20 > >
21 > > I've tried different cpufreq governors ( default is ondemand ) and that
22 > > doesn't appear to be an issue.
23 > >
24 > > Any help or suggestions would be appreciated.
25 > >
26 > > Thanks.
27 >
28 > Is updatedb or some similar indexer running? Being a new install it might
29 > still be building its index for the first time.
30 >
31 > I've noticed before that processes in io-wait seem to count towards the
32 > load
33 > average, even though they might not be actually using the CPU that much.
34 >
35 > Shawn
36 >
37 >
38 Nope, nothing. Top shows all 0's under CPU. Nothing appears to be doing
39 anything at all.
40
41 As an example:
42
43 top - 09:25:20 up 1:31, 1 user, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 0.92
44 Tasks: 65 total, 1 running, 64 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
45 Cpu0 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si,
46 0.0%st
47 Cpu1 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si,
48 0.0%st
49 Mem: 4145288k total, 328960k used, 3816328k free, 21112k buffers
50 Swap: 8377856k total, 0k used, 8377856k free, 256796k cached
51
52 PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
53 COMMAND
54
55 5273 root 20 0 2428 1108 876 R 0 0.0 0:03.71
56 top
57
58 1 root 20 0 1744 504 444 S 0 0.0 0:00.28
59 init
60
61 2 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00
62 kthreadd
63
64 3 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00
65 migration/0
66
67 4 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.02
68 ksoftirqd/0
69
70 5 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00
71 migration/1
72
73 6 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.02
74 ksoftirqd/1
75
76 7 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00
77 events/0
78
79 8 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.01
80 events/1
81
82 9 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper
83
84
85 --
86 Beau Dylan Henderson
87
88 "No human being should be denied the fundamental right to educate themselves
89 or indulge their curiosities. To deny any person the right to do so, for
90 whatever reason, is nothing more than the safeguarding of ignorance to
91 ensure that enlightenment does not become a threat. For nothing in this
92 world is more dangerous than an open mind." -- Matthew Good

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Constant Load 1.00+ on new Toshiba laptop Beau Henderson <beau@××××××××××××.com>