| 1 |
On 7/3/06, Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> It's ~arch, you shouldn't get it unless you're running an ~arch system |
| 3 |
> or specifically added it to package.keywords. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I am. |
| 6 |
My system is all ~x86, except for gcc, glibc and binutils, because I |
| 7 |
had an awful experience with those in the past, which left the system |
| 8 |
completely unusable. glibc problems aren't something we want to have |
| 9 |
to deal with (even python didn't run, so no portage to help). |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> I don't think it should be tied into having anything else upgraded, with |
| 12 |
> the exception of xproto 7.0.7, so I'm a bit surprised you're hitting |
| 13 |
> these bugs. Good job tracking it down, though. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Yes, perhaps instead of masking individual package versions, I should |
| 16 |
leave some of those packages tied to x86, that would still allow some |
| 17 |
updates. |
| 18 |
Anyway, I have the habit of looking at package.* and recheck if things |
| 19 |
still need to be there. For example, I still have the unmasks for |
| 20 |
gnome-2.14, which I think aren't needed anymore, so I'll remove them. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Bruno Lustosa <bruno@×××××××.net> |
| 24 |
ZCE - Zend Certified Engineer - PHP! |
| 25 |
http://www.lustosa.net/ |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives