| 1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 09/02/2015 00:50, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Sunday 08 February 2015 17:31:33 wabenbau@×××××.com wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Am Sonntag, 08.02.2015 um 15:30 schrieb Alan McKinnon |
| 5 |
>>> <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>: |
| 6 |
>>>> I actively seek out and use fonts with a stroked zero (or at least |
| 7 |
>>>> with a dot in the middle of the zero. I can never remember if the |
| 8 |
>>>> digit is the fat one or the thin one |
| 9 |
>>> It's the same with me. :-) |
| 10 |
>> I'd have thought it was easy enough: the zero is the same width as the |
| 11 |
>> other numerals. The O is bigger. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I have a horrible suspicion all 3 of us wear spectacles :-) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> And it's been a few years since I could spot a difference of 2 pixels wide! |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Anyone besides me use the ctrl + shortcut to zoom in? I do that and I |
| 21 |
have bi-focals on. I also have a magnifying glass right in front of my |
| 22 |
monitor. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Sounds bad don't it? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Dale |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
:-) :-) |
Archives