1 |
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
2 |
> extremly long. So long that you have to start ooo several times a day for a |
3 |
> year so that the saved startup time equalizes the time spent compiling it. |
4 |
> |
5 |
I have to disagree. On my laptop Dell Inspiron 6400, Dual Core Pentium |
6 |
(T2130) 1.8 GHz, |
7 |
2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. The compile time is absolutely OK. Important is |
8 |
that the feature |
9 |
"ccache" in make.conf is enabled and MAKEOPTS has a reasonable value, I |
10 |
have set it |
11 |
to "-j2". I follow the rule MAKEOPTS=<number CPUS>. But in the case of |
12 |
openoffice, the |
13 |
ebuild overwrite this value with "-j1". For the version 2.3.x I had set |
14 |
the variable |
15 |
WANT_MP but with version 2.4 it breaks the build. But how you can see |
16 |
in the following, |
17 |
that's only a minor problem. |
18 |
|
19 |
wolf-di6400 0(0) 03:04 PM ~ # qlop -gH openoffice |
20 |
openoffice: Fri May 2 16:22:23 2008: 1 hour, 20 minutes, 38 seconds |
21 |
openoffice: Sat May 3 04:06:11 2008: 1 hour, 19 minutes, 12 seconds |
22 |
openoffice: 2 times |
23 |
|
24 |
wolf-di6400 0(0) 03:04 PM ~ # emerge -avt openoffice |
25 |
|
26 |
These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: |
27 |
|
28 |
Calculating dependencies... done! |
29 |
[ebuild R ] app-office/openoffice-2.4.0 USE="binfilter cups dbus |
30 |
firefox gnome gstreamer gtk java ldap mono odk opengl pam -debug -eds |
31 |
-kde -seamonkey -webdav -xulrunner" LINGUAS="-af -ar -as_IN -be_BY -bg |
32 |
-bn -br -bs -ca -cs -cy -da -de -dz -el -en -en_GB -en_US -en_ZA -eo -es |
33 |
-et -fa -fi -fr -ga -gl -gu_IN -he -hi_IN -hr -hu -it -ja -km -ko -ku |
34 |
-lt -lv -mk -ml_IN -mr_IN -nb -ne -nl -nn -nr -ns -or_IN -pa_IN -pl -pt |
35 |
-pt_BR -ru -rw -sh -sk -sl -sr -ss -st -sv -sw_TZ -ta_IN -te_IN -tg -th |
36 |
-ti_ER -tn -tr -ts -uk -ur_IN -ve -vi -xh -zh_CN -zh_TW -zu" 0 kB |
37 |
|
38 |
Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB |
39 |
|
40 |
> If you are even able to. Openoffice is a bitch to compile. Even the slightest |
41 |
> change might break the compilation. It really, really sucks. IMHO openoffice |
42 |
> is a nice example for everything that is wrong. |
43 |
> |
44 |
I can't this confirm. |
45 |
> Go with openoffice-bin. |
46 |
See above. |
47 |
|
48 |
W. Canis |