Archives
Archives
| From: | Todd Goodman <tsg@×××××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Strange GCC behavior | ||
| Date: | Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:45:25 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110929174354.GF8126@ns1.bonedaddy.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Strange GCC behavior by Nilesh Govindarajan |
||
| 1 | * Nilesh Govindarajan <contact@××××××××.com> [110929 13:33]: |
| 2 | > Default function arguments in C are specified like this: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function |
| 5 | |
| 6 | No they're not. C doesn't have default function arguments. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > Now I save that in a file called foo.c |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > The above piece of code is valid in C as well as C++ |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Uh, no it's not. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | > |
| 16 | > Why is this happening? O_o |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Because it's not correct C. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | Todd |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Strange GCC behavior | Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Strange GCC behavior | Nilesh Govindarajan <contact@××××××××.com> |