| 1 |
On Saturday 01 April 2006 23:47, Jim wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 22:29 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 3 |
> > alexander@blatt /var/db/pkg $ epm -qf `which xmkmf ` |
| 4 |
> > imake-1.0.1-r1 |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Please file a bug against tightvnc, as it's missing |
| 7 |
> > a dependency. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Will do. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > BTW: Why use tightvnc at all? Realvnc 4 is as fast in |
| 12 |
> > my experience and there's still somebody workign on it - |
| 13 |
> > seeing that the last update to tightvnc is dated |
| 14 |
> > July 2005, I doubt that anybody maintains it anymore. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I am testing out the different vnc versions along with freeNX to see |
| 17 |
> what will give me the fastest remote desktop. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> > Alexander Skwar |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Jim |
| 22 |
> -- |
| 23 |
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- |
| 24 |
> I'm a geek, but I don't get it. 36-24-36 = -24. What's the significance? |
| 25 |
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- |
| 26 |
> Florida, USA, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way |
| 27 |
When you're done testing please report/publish the results, I'm also very |
| 28 |
interested in a fast remote desktop system. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Tightvnc can hog the cpu with the compression sometimes so that's not always a |
| 31 |
good solution either. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Rick van Hattem Rick.van.Hattem(at)Fawo.nl |
Archives