Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Bind problems when registering new domains....
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 07:46:50
Message-Id: 20110927094543.3f47a860@rohan.example.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Bind problems when registering new domains.... by Jens Reinemuth
1 On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:10:53 +0200
2 Jens Reinemuth <jens@×××××××××.info> wrote:
3
4 > Hi everybody,
5 >
6 > i registered a new domain yesterday and tried to set the primary ans
7 > secondary nameserver as usual, which resulted in the following
8 > error-message:
9 >
10 > Nameserver error - ERROR: 116 SOA record response must be
11 > authoritative (resolver, answer)
12 > ([/10.121.46.9|/2001:608:6:7:5:0:0:11]=--80.239.175.176:53 (UDP,
13 > PROTOCOL_EXPLICITLY_CHOSEN, Timeout: 3s, Retry: 1 x 0s, unsecure,
14 > ignoreTC), [/10.121.46.9|/2001:608:6:7:5:0:0:11]=--80.239.175.176:53
15 > (UDP, PROTOCOL_EXPLICITLY_CHOSEN, Timeout: 3s, Retry: 1 x 0s,
16 > unsecure, ignoreTC): RA )
17
18
19 Is this for a .de zone?
20
21 Google returns many many hits for that error, all of them related
22 to .de somehow. This link seems to lay out the registrar rules nicely:
23
24 http://www.denic.de/en/background/name-server-service-of-denic/name-server-and-nsentry-data.html?cHash=3486f26050ac1dc3cbe6f5842dc70494
25
26 Your problem is certainly not related to bind itself, but to the data
27 in your zone file. .de has a reputation of being somewhat ever-the-top
28 pedantic and your zone files seem to have something in them that the
29 registrar doesn't like.
30
31
32
33 >
34 > In the server there are 2 networking-interfaces, the ip-address of the
35 > error belongs to the second one...
36 >
37 >
38 > I am currently running bind-9.7.4 and did not change anything to the
39 > config (except adding the new domain to the zones...)
40 >
41 > As i am not really into the whole bind-thingy (someone configured it
42 > for me...) i am totally stuck here...
43 >
44 > Actually i tried to update bind to bind-9.8.1 and performed all the
45 > chmods that were suggested, but no change... Still got the same
46 > errors.
47 >
48 > Perhaps there is someone out there who can help me with this issue...
49 >
50 > Regards,
51 >
52 > Jens
53 >
54
55
56
57 --
58 Alan McKinnnon
59 alan.mckinnon@×××××.com