From: | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security. | ||
Date: | Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:31:30 | ||
Message-Id: | 522DE9A6.8010408@gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Internet security. by Dale |
1 | Dale wrote: |
2 | > Someone found this and sent it to me. |
3 | > |
4 | > http://news.yahoo.com/internet-experts-want-security-revamp-nsa-revelations-020838711--sector.html |
5 | > |
6 | > |
7 | > <<<< SNIP>>>> |
8 | > |
9 | > Am I right on this, wrong or somewhere in the middle? |
10 | > |
11 | > Dale |
12 | > |
13 | > :-) :-) |
14 | > |
15 | |
16 | |
17 | I got this in my email today. |
18 | |
19 | https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/08/one-key-rule-them-all-threats-against-service-provider-private-encryption-keys |
20 | |
21 | |
22 | It seems, I may be wrong on this tho, that some changes are being made. |
23 | While there is a lot of info there, it also seems that each site has one |
24 | key and once you have that one key, you can then handle the whole sites |
25 | encryption. Example: Google, Facebook, a bank, the EFF site or whatever. |
26 | |
27 | It seems we are back to face to face and even that isn't a sure thing. |
28 | |
29 | I'm still reading some of the other posts. It seems this is a mess with |
30 | no real sure answer since it all depends on a lot of other things. |
31 | Mostly we don't know for sure what information the spy folks have and |
32 | what is compromised and what is not. < sighs > |
33 | |
34 | Dale |
35 | |
36 | :-) :-) |
37 | |
38 | -- |
39 | I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |