Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] slocate masked
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:09:57
Message-Id: 201011172036.12653.michaelkintzios@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] slocate masked by Yohan Pereira
1 On Wednesday 17 November 2010 20:10:54 Yohan Pereira wrote:
2 > On Thursday 18 Nov 2010 1:17:09 am Alan McKinnon wrote:
3 > > Let's compare then. My system is 4 minutes to re-index everything from
4 > > scratch. How long does your take and how big is your filesystem?
5 >
6 > time updatedb
7 > real 1m35.163s
8 > user 0m0.815s
9 > sys 0m2.454s
10 >
11 > this was the first time i ran it after installation. i had uinstalled
12 > slocate prior to this.
13 >
14 > PRUNEPATHS="/tmp /var/tmp /root/.ccache /media/stuff/backup/gentoo32"
15 >
16 > the last folder is my 32bit chroot.
17 > and i got arround 225 gb of data. i tried running a few qurries .. seems to
18 > have indexed everything
19 >
20 > also after this i tried deleting /var/lib/mlocate/mlocate.db and then
21 > running updatedb and it hardly took a second.
22 >
23 > time updatedb
24 >
25 > real 0m0.367s
26 > user 0m0.193s
27 > sys 0m0.167s
28 >
29 > weird indeed.
30
31 I can't be doing this right ...
32
33 I removed /var/lib/mlocate/mlocate.db, the ran updatebd:
34
35 # time -p updatedb
36 real 113.22
37 user 0.62
38 sys 8.00
39
40 Then removed it again and run it again:
41
42 # time updatedb
43
44 real 0m1.063s
45 user 0m0.162s
46 sys 0m0.896s
47
48 Why is the second time so much faster? The size of the derived db was the
49 same on both occasions.
50 --
51 Regards,
52 Mick

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] slocate masked Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] slocate masked Yohan Pereira <yohan.pereira@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] slocate masked Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>