1 |
On Wednesday 27 July 2011 16:35:13 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:52:53 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
> > > I wonder how effective tmpfs is for PORTAGE_TMPDIR as the builds |
4 |
> > > that need a lot of disk space can often require a fair bit of |
5 |
> > > memory too, and tmpfs is using it all. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > In this last week someone reported doing actually measurements and |
8 |
> > found that using a tmpfs was actually slower. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Yes, but that was Dale and nothing works as it should for him :-O |
11 |
|
12 |
I did similar tests as well and came to the conclusion that the speed |
13 |
difference was minimal. Actually favouring the physical drive. |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Joost |