1 |
* burlingk@×××××××××.mil <burlingk@×××××××××.mil> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
Hi, |
4 |
|
5 |
> First: Cosmetic things, i.e. user interface issues, pretty |
6 |
> pictures, and things that effect the overall look and feel. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> If they do not stop the program from functioning, they are |
9 |
> not high priority. It may be agitating to look at, but it |
10 |
> is not a bug. |
11 |
|
12 |
Isnt that what the severity "enhancement" is for ? |
13 |
|
14 |
> Second: Bug reports for real bugs. |
15 |
> Bug reports need to be thorough. If they do not provide enough |
16 |
> information to reproduce a bug, or at least explain exactly what |
17 |
> is going on, then it is hard for the developers and bug squashers |
18 |
> to do anything about it. |
19 |
|
20 |
Sometimes, as the reported, you miss some important things. Okay. |
21 |
Then the wrangler (or whom else works onthr bug) simply should ask |
22 |
for more information. |
23 |
|
24 |
But if your bugs are always marked as invalid, you loose any |
25 |
motiviation for further contributions. Bug reports are also |
26 |
contribution. |
27 |
|
28 |
> Mounting your config files for firefox from a coda file |
29 |
> system is far from standard in anyone's books. |
30 |
|
31 |
Maybe. And maybe I'm almost alone with using Coda on Gentoo, |
32 |
since the ebuilds are still very, very old. |
33 |
|
34 |
But did anyone ask why I'm using symlinks in my ff profile, |
35 |
or why the permission test might failed. Or did anyone tell |
36 |
"hey, be careful about [...], we need it fo [...]" ? |
37 |
|
38 |
No. The whole issue was simply declared invalid. |
39 |
|
40 |
> if the idea of creating a new profile would not work for you, |
41 |
> then recreating your firefox directory, with "physical" copies |
42 |
> of the symlinked files would do the trick as well. |
43 |
|
44 |
Not really. The symlinks are no problem for FF, it works perfectly |
45 |
well. And I *need* them to store temporary stuff locally. |
46 |
It's mozilla-launcher which artificially breaks if it *thinks* |
47 |
something could be wrong. |
48 |
|
49 |
> Imagine if you just sunk three years into a project, and suddenly |
50 |
> someone started attacking you because it didn't work perfectly on |
51 |
> their system. |
52 |
|
53 |
Well, I'm working on lots of OSS projects for many many years. |
54 |
But I never ever felt being attacked by an bug report. |
55 |
|
56 |
|
57 |
cu |
58 |
-- |
59 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
60 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
61 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
62 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
63 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
64 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
65 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
66 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
67 |
-- |
68 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |