1 |
I have used genkernel for my initramfs. |
2 |
|
3 |
The dracut one seems to hang on a kernel panic(Implying that it did not |
4 |
load the correct modules for luks and lvm). |
5 |
|
6 |
Besides the size of your initramfs should not matter since its only used |
7 |
to mount the partitions and do the pre-kernel loading. |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
The only thing that you will win by making your own initramfs would be |
11 |
size and boot speed. |
12 |
|
13 |
Correct me if im wrong btw. |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
On 15-08-16 02:45, Rich Freeman wrote: |
17 |
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
18 |
>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 4:29 PM, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote: |
19 |
>>> On August 14, 2016 8:55:32 PM GMT+02:00, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
20 |
>>>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 11:48:08 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: |
21 |
>>>> |
22 |
>>>>> Don't you still need genkernel if you want to build an initramfs? |
23 |
>>>> No, dracut. |
24 |
>>>> |
25 |
>>>>> The handbook (amd64) seems to imply you do, and I don't know of an |
26 |
>>>> easy |
27 |
>>>>> way to build an initramfs just with the bare kernel source. |
28 |
>>>> Dracut. |
29 |
>>> Dracut if you just want something quick and easy. |
30 |
>>> If you want something small and reliable, build your own. |
31 |
>> A homegrown initramfs created by a novice is going to be more reliable |
32 |
>> than one created by dracut or genkernel? Seems unlikely. |
33 |
>> |
34 |
> This is a silly argument. Everybody knows that anybody who wants |
35 |
> something reliable just writes their own kernel in the first place. |
36 |
> |