From: | Al <oss.elmar@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: static-libs | ||
Date: | Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:27:49 | ||
Message-Id: | AANLkTi=c795UqMyN9mxm801rzo+w0ZgjEdwS-vRSiGJ7@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: static-libs by Andrea Conti |
1 | > You can't link dynamically against a library archive, so all DL code on |
2 | |
3 | Don't you contradict |
4 | http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/introduction.html with |
5 | this? |
6 | |
7 | Practically you never do. But could, if you really wanted? |
8 | |
9 | AFAIK you need PIC only to share libs in memory. The rest is already |
10 | covered by MMU. |
11 | |
12 | So why shouldn't you be able to load an unshared lib (without PIC) |
13 | dynamically? Sure there still would be some additional steps. |
14 | |
15 | Al |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: static-libs | Andrea Conti <alyf@××××.net> |