1 |
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Yohan Pereira <yohan.pereira@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> On 30/01/13 at 11:09pm, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: |
4 |
>>> Since Gentoo updates libraries very quickly, I'm wondering if it is |
5 |
>>> safe to use the binary version? Has anyone faced library breakages on |
6 |
>>> this? |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> Chromium is easily recompiled with new libraries and you don't have a |
9 |
>>> broken browser, which won't really be the case with the binary |
10 |
>>> version. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> I've used the binary version (google-chrome) for a while and never |
13 |
>> had any breakages. I guess if there's a library update that could |
14 |
>> potentially break google-chrome the gentoo devs would add a blocker so |
15 |
>> you wont be able to install the 2 at the same time. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Or I can just bundle a copy of the necessary libraries, similar to |
19 |
> what I have done for libudev.so.0. |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
Sounds good. I guess I'll switch to binary chrome then. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Nilesh Govindrajan |
26 |
http://nileshgr.com |