1 |
On 7/9/07, Philip Webb <purslow@×××××××××.ca> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> <snip> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> (1) 3rd Machine |
6 |
> |
7 |
> (a) CPU -- AMD 64 X2 4800+ (65 W) , 512 K , 65 nm , socket AM2 |
8 |
> or AMD 64 X2 5600+ (89 W) , 1 M , 90 nm , socket AM2 |
9 |
> (b) Mobo -- Asus M2N-E Nforce 570 , DDR2 533/667/800 |
10 |
> (c) Memory -- Kingston , 1 GB , 800 |
11 |
> (d) Graphix -- Asus EN8500GT Nvidia , 512 MB DDR2 800 |
12 |
> (e) HDD -- W Digital , 500 GB , 16 MB |
13 |
> (f) DVD-RW -- Samsung SH-S182F/BEBN , DVD-W 8x , CD-W 32x |
14 |
> (g) Diskette -- from 1st machine |
15 |
> (h) Case -- store-brand Radiant P4 Mid (500 W) |
16 |
> |
17 |
> (2) Additions for 2nd machine |
18 |
> |
19 |
> (a) Copy data into 2nd machine : DVD-ROM -- LiteOn 16x |
20 |
> (b) Switch keyboard/mouse/monitor : KVM switch -- DLink |
21 |
> |
22 |
> (3) LCD Monitor -- Samsung SyncMaster 931BW , 19 in , 1440x900 , 2 ms |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
<snip> |
26 |
|
27 |
(1a) I'm confused by the CPU features '65 nm' & '90 nm': |
28 |
> yes, I know they refer to tiny distances, |
29 |
> but would expect the faster CPU to have the smaller distance, |
30 |
> whereas the opposite is true for those listed (AMD docs don't mention |
31 |
> it). |
32 |
> (1d) The Nvidia site lists '8500GT' as supported by driver 100-14-09 , |
33 |
> which is in Portage, but currently masked (the reason is not clear); |
34 |
> Phoronix has a review of this card used with Linux. |
35 |
> (1f 2a) I'm new to DVD's, which I plan to use for back-ups |
36 |
> & to keep the 2nd machine upto-date as an emergency alternative; |
37 |
> I don't now do video or gaming, but the box should support them in case. |
38 |
> (1h) The store will probably confirm whether the power supply is adequate. |
39 |
> (2b) A KVM switch seems a big improvement on plug/unplugging connections. |
40 |
> (3) My Samsung SyncMaster 550s CRT monitor (2000) still works very well. |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Does anyone have any warnings or comments re any of the bits & pieces ? |
43 |
> |
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
(1a): If this is just a backup machine, I would recommend the one that uses |
47 |
the less power. Also, make sure you compile CPU scaling into the kernel. |
48 |
Unless of course heat or energy use isn't an issue. |
49 |
(1d): I can imagine it's masked because it hasn't been fully tested to be |
50 |
marked as stable yet; however, I have used it on my system which has a |
51 |
8800GTS card, and it seemed to work fine, although it wasn't terribly stable |
52 |
(only tested it with Beryl). 2D seems fine. |
53 |
(1h): Unless it's a brand name power supply or case that comes with one, |
54 |
I'd recommend junking it and buying a good quality, brand name power supply, |
55 |
like Thermaltake or Antec. You gamble the rest of your system failing when |
56 |
you use a lower-end power supply. |
57 |
|
58 |
-- |
59 |
- Mark Shields |