| 1 |
On Samstag 31 Juli 2010, Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 31 July 2010 16:33:18 Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Kacper Kopczyński wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Dnia 2010-07-31, o godz. 16:15:51 |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > Volker Armin Hemmann<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> napisał(a): |
| 7 |
> > >> On Samstag 31 Juli 2010, Kacper Kopczyński wrote: |
| 8 |
> > >>> Hi, |
| 9 |
> > >>> |
| 10 |
> > >>> My problem is really strange - I can't access my hard drive from |
| 11 |
> > >>> linux, but it works from windows without problems. It has some bad |
| 12 |
> > >>> blocks. |
| 13 |
> > >> |
| 14 |
> > >> it has a lot of bad blocks and a fucked up firmware it seems. No way |
| 15 |
> > >> it is working 'without problems'. |
| 16 |
> > > |
| 17 |
> > > Well total space taken by bad blocks according to chkdsk is less than |
| 18 |
> > > 1MB, windows is still able to access all data. Linux is only able to |
| 19 |
> > > see partition table "for a while" - as you can see in dmesg. |
| 20 |
> > > |
| 21 |
> > > If firmware is broken then how it is possible that windows is able to |
| 22 |
> > > use this disk? |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > Maybe windoze is ignoring the problem? It's not like windoze has never |
| 25 |
> > done that before right? |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> > Just a thought. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Couldn't it be that the MSWindows partition has no bad blocks, while Linux |
| 30 |
> does? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
it is not about partitions. |
Archives