1 |
> Well, whether the headers are from an IMAP server or an NNTP server, |
2 |
> they're still headers. It's my understanding that Thunderbird only |
3 |
|
4 |
point 1: |
5 |
|
6 |
Right, if you compare IMAP and NNTP it is similar in this. In NNTP it |
7 |
is the default to only read the header. In mail (IMAP, POP, HTML) it |
8 |
is the default to get it all deliverd. That strongly influences how |
9 |
the community as a whole feels about postings and discussions. It's |
10 |
not only about the single user. |
11 |
|
12 |
> downloads everything in my mail folder because I tell it to. I could |
13 |
> just as easily not tell it to, and only double-click on the messages |
14 |
> that are interesting to me, and simply delete the rest. Since I'm |
15 |
> trying to learn as much as possible about Gentoo (I've only been using |
16 |
> Linux about a year or two), I choose to download it all, cause I'm going |
17 |
> to read it all; I learn a lot from things that I don't even intend to use. |
18 |
|
19 |
point 2: |
20 |
|
21 |
That is the most important point. In NNTP you can download an read all |
22 |
postings from the past (with or without the body). You can search |
23 |
them, without the use of a search machine, directly from your reader. |
24 |
You don't need to discuss the same question again and again. |
25 |
|
26 |
In mail you can only read the postings from the moment you subscribed. |
27 |
Once you did loose them, your knowlage base is gone. |
28 |
|
29 |
> to give the impression that I'm burdened by the amount of mail |
30 |
> generated; if so, I'd simply unsubscribe. |
31 |
|
32 |
That is the feeling about postings in mail. In NNTP you would not feel |
33 |
this way. You would say that you read fewer of the postings. |
34 |
|
35 |
> 1.) That's a separate discussion, one you'd have to take up with the |
36 |
> Gentoo devs. You can ask if there's interested here, but I would think |
37 |
> that's about as far as this mailing list could go with it. |
38 |
|
39 |
point 3: |
40 |
|
41 |
It would require one strong admin in the developers team, convinced |
42 |
itself of the advantages and with a missionary nature. |
43 |
|
44 |
> 2.) It's been a while since I used newsgroups, but I thought you pointed |
45 |
> your newsreader to a server that had the newsgroup in question, and then |
46 |
> read it from there? If your news server doesn't have that newsgroup, |
47 |
> you should ask for it? Other than that, I can't help; as I said, it's |
48 |
> been a long time since I used it. |
49 |
|
50 |
point 4: |
51 |
|
52 |
You think of those big news providers, that serve many groups. I think |
53 |
of a gentoo owend news server, that only provides the gentoo groups, |
54 |
nothing else. You subscribe directly to that gentoo server, not to the |
55 |
newsserver of your provider. |
56 |
|
57 |
> I didn't say I was "advanced". But are you saying that using a |
58 |
> newsgroup is really that different that using e-mail? You double-click |
59 |
|
60 |
I consider you advance if you use thunderbird and you know to use the |
61 |
options of IMAP. |
62 |
|
63 |
Al |