Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Arve Barsnes <arve.barsnes@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Options for "emerge"
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 14:54:51
Message-Id: CAJjrzcW74qO8Qi2sThOMqQvh5NdE1QPwfB_Fiyc0wpNm=mSRFw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Options for "emerge" by Dr Rainer Woitok
1 On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 at 15:40, Dr Rainer Woitok <rainer.woitok@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > But if I understand the "emerge" manual page correctly, "--changed-deps"
3 > causes a rebuild of a package, if one of its dependencies has been re-
4 > build, even though the package does not require the newer version of the
5 > dependency. So does it really make sense to have this option hardcoded
6 > in a script? Or does it just cause plenty of package rebuilds without
7 > any real effect? Likewise, what about "--deep"? Should I keep it?
8
9 "--deep" seems like a good idea, to minimise the chance of trouble,
10 but "--changed-deps" does indeed seem excessive.
11
12 I also have "--oneshot" in my updates, although I'm not sure if this
13 actually makes a difference on a world update.
14
15 I also have "--backtrack=100" to minimise the risk of portage not
16 being able to find an upgrade path for some troublesome package. Just
17 as "--deep" it will add to the time portage needs to calculate what
18 packages to update, but it feels like I've had less instances of
19 upgrade path troubles since adding it to my regular world update
20 command.
21
22 Regards,
23 Arve

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Options for "emerge" Wols Lists <antlists@××××××××××××.uk>