| 1 |
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:53:11 +0000 (UTC), James wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> for i in $(find /lib* /usr/lib*) ; do qfile -o $i ; done |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> It worked like a charm, except there is a huge list? |
| 6 |
> It overfilled my scroll back, so below is a tiny snippet. |
| 7 |
> I'm weary of removing so many files? |
| 8 |
> rm these files? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> revdep-rebuild comes back clean. Check with another tool? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
revdep-rebuild checks for binaries built against non-existent |
| 13 |
libraries, you are looking for surlpus libraries,so it won't help. You're |
| 14 |
already using the correct tool, qfile. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> I already synced and updated, do again? |
| 17 |
> ???? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> <snip> |
| 20 |
> /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/_xmlplus/dom/html/HTMLElement.pyo |
| 21 |
> <snip> |
| 22 |
> /usr/lib64/libblas.a |
| 23 |
> /usr/lib64/libruby.so |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Ignore the .pyo and.pyc files, they are created by ebuilds after |
| 26 |
installation, so don't show up in the packages' contents. The .so files |
| 27 |
certainly look guilty, but move them somewhere rather than deleting, |
| 28 |
then run revdep-rebuild. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Error reading FAT record: Try the SKINNY one? (Y/N) |
Archives