1 |
Hello, |
2 |
|
3 |
Before I file a bug report, maybe somebody |
4 |
on this list has some additional info on PG9? |
5 |
|
6 |
Well a routine compilation of snort, croaked |
7 |
based on removal of pg8 and only pg9 being |
8 |
on the system. Note: I have little interest |
9 |
in going back to PG8; I'll leave snort broken |
10 |
until I figure out PG9..... |
11 |
|
12 |
Here's were I have looked for PG9 information: |
13 |
/usr/share/doc/postgresql-9.0 |
14 |
|
15 |
/usr/portage/dev-db/postgresql-base/ |
16 |
postgresql-base-9.0.3.ebuild |
17 |
Here I find this: |
18 |
elog "If you need a global psqlrc-file, you can place it in:" |
19 |
elog " '${ROOT}/etc/postgresql-${SLOT}/'" |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
/var/log/elog |
23 |
<was not set up, but is now, on the |
24 |
sytem in question. From another system |
25 |
where elog and pg9 both exist I found: |
26 |
|
27 |
dev-db:postgresql-base-9.0.3:20110219-195957.log |
28 |
|
29 |
* If you need a global psqlrc-file, you can place it in: |
30 |
* '//etc/postgresql-9.0/' |
31 |
|
32 |
<snip> |
33 |
checking for mysql setting of reconnect option |
34 |
before connect bug... no |
35 |
checking for postgresql... |
36 |
|
37 |
********************************************** |
38 |
ERROR: unable to find postgresql header file (libpq-fe.h) |
39 |
checked in the following places |
40 |
/usr/include |
41 |
/usr/include/pgsql |
42 |
/usr/local/include |
43 |
/usr/local/include/pgsql |
44 |
/usr/local/pgsql/include |
45 |
/usr/local/pgsql/include/pgsql |
46 |
/usr/pgsql/include |
47 |
/usr/pgsql/include/pgsql |
48 |
/usr/local/include |
49 |
/usr/local/include/pgsql |
50 |
********************************************** |
51 |
/var/tmp/portage/net-analyzer/snort-2.9.0.3/ |
52 |
work/snort-2.9.0.3/config.log |
53 |
ERROR: net-analyzer/snort-2.9.0.3 failed (configure phase) |
54 |
|
55 |
BUG 356001 |
56 |
From my reading on another pgsql bug, make sure you use eselect to set your |
57 |
postgres version. After you do that, you should be able to merge pgadmin. |
58 |
|
59 |
# eselect postgresql show |
60 |
(none) |
61 |
|
62 |
|
63 |
It seems the eselect mechanism fixed the problem for one user, |
64 |
but mine broken, so I'll "-1" eselect-postgresql and see what |
65 |
happens... |
66 |
|
67 |
same result. |
68 |
|
69 |
guidance? |
70 |
|
71 |
james |