Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:31:48
Message-Id: 5bdc1c8b0901191631h2577f67cge7976962fd754e6a@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages... by Dale
1 On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
2 <SNIP>
3 >
4 > Hence the question, should this be a default option? I'm not the only
5 > one that has ran into this.
6 >
7 > Dale
8
9 Maybe it's a forest for trees thing but it's in the man page and shows
10 up early in Gentoo Portage documentation:
11
12 http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/doc/faq.xml
13
14 I don't think it's required for all folks so I don't think it should
15 be default. It does result in longer emerge cycles as it grabs and
16 builds more code on average. Many folks might not want that.
17
18 Just my thoughts,
19 Mark

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages... Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>