1 |
On 2006-05-05 19:11, Farhan Ahmed uttered these thoughts: |
2 |
> Well userlocales USE flag was there in glibc-2.4-r1 but it's absent in |
3 |
> glibc-2.4-r2.. But here's the weird thing, I had compiled glibc-2.4-r1 |
4 |
> with userlocales USE flag, in my /etc/locales.build I just have |
5 |
> |
6 |
> en_US/ISO-8859-1 |
7 |
> en_US.UTF-8/UTF-8 |
8 |
> |
9 |
> so the locale -a output, quiet expectantly, is: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> C |
12 |
> en_US |
13 |
> en_US.utf8 |
14 |
> POSIX |
15 |
> |
16 |
> But with 2.4-r2 there is no such flag as userlocales and I was expecting |
17 |
> glibc to build all locales, but to my surprise I still have the above |
18 |
> said locales only.. Any ideas? |
19 |
|
20 |
locale-gen automatically uses /etc/locales.build (if it exists) if it |
21 |
doesn't find any locales to generate in /etc/locale.gen |
22 |
|
23 |
Regards, |
24 |
Patrick Börjesson |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
() The ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML Email |
28 |
/\ and proprietary formats. |