| 1 |
On Thu 20 Oct 2011 05:30:24 AM IST, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Albert W. Hopkins |
| 3 |
> <marduk@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 13:11 -0700, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> Why don't you try networkmanager-0.9.1.90? It's working great for me |
| 6 |
>>> in GNOME 3.2.0 |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> Is there something in the live ebuild that you need? |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>> I can't confirm (never tried it) but I've been told the autounmask |
| 11 |
>> option in portage will "blindly" unmask even live ebuilds.. which might |
| 12 |
>> account for people suddenly pulling in a surprising (and potentially |
| 13 |
>> problematic) amount of live ebuilds. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I haven't tried the autounmask option from portage, neither. The GNOME |
| 16 |
> overlay offers a series of files you can link to your |
| 17 |
> /etc/portage/package.{unmask,keywords,use,use.mask} directories: They |
| 18 |
> are located in |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> ${OVERLAYDIR}/status/portage-configs/ |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I haven't used those either, though. I prefer to unmask/keyword |
| 23 |
> packages myself. What I do know is that using live ebuilds is |
| 24 |
> basically flipping a coin; sometimes will work great, sometimes it |
| 25 |
> will not even compile. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Right now the only live ebuilds I'm using are: |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> gnome-extra/libgda-9999 |
| 30 |
> media-sound/rhythmbox-9999 |
| 31 |
> sys-apps/gnome-disk-utility-9999 |
| 32 |
> gnome-extra/gnome-shell-extensions-weather-9999 |
| 33 |
> gnome-extra/gnome-shell-extensions-system-monitor-9999 |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Everything else works with the latest non-live ebuilds. |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> Regards. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Did you just do emerge gnome (assumging that >=gnome-base/gnome-3.0 is |
| 40 |
in package.unmask)? I'll try doing that again then, till now autounmask |
| 41 |
was active. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
Nilesh Govindarajan |
| 45 |
http://nileshgr.com |
Archives