Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Linux USB security holes.
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 07:24:35
Message-Id: 1836dfed-0545-cdda-e9af-d12f143a6559@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Linux USB security holes. by R0b0t1
1 R0b0t1 wrote:
2 > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:10 AM, R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote:
3 >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >>> Dale wrote:
5 >>>> Howdy,
6 >>>>
7 >>>> I ran up on this link. Is there any truth to it and should any of us
8 >>>> Gentooers be worried about it?
9 >>>>
10 >>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/11/07/linux_usb_security_bugs/
11 >>>>
12 >>>> Isn't Linux supposed to be more secure than this??
13 >>>>
14 >>>> Dale
15 >>>>
16 >>>> :-) :-)
17 >>>>
18 >>>
19 >>> To reply to all that posted so far. I did see that it requires physical
20 >>> access, like a lot of other things. Once a person has physical access,
21 >>> there are a number of things that can go wrong.
22 >>>
23 >>> It does seem to be one of those things that while possible, has anyone
24 >>> been able to do it in the real world and even without physical access?
25 >>> Odds are, no.
26 >>>
27 >> The most widely publicized example is STUXNET. There are also reports
28 >> that malicious USB keys with driver-level exploits are sometimes used
29 >> for industrial espionage.
30 >>
31 >> The key point being that in either case, someone is spending a lot of
32 >> money to research and set up a plausible attack.
33 >>
34 >>> Still, all things considered, Linux is pretty secure. BSD is more
35 >>> secure from what I've read but Linux is better than windoze.
36 >>>
37 >>> Dale
38 >>>
39 >>> :-) :-)
40 >>>
41 > I suppose I should add that once the basic work has been done for an
42 > exploit like this it will have great reproducibility. But at that
43 > level you are (usually) talking about very well funded actors, and one
44 > should also be worried about controller-level exploits that would be
45 > much harder to discover from an operating system.
46 >
47 > If you can't surround your computer with trustworthy armed guards,
48 > assume you suffer from a serious vulnerability based on the
49 > preliminary work the article is talking about.
50 >
51 > Rainbows and Sunshine,
52 > R0b0t1
53 >
54 >
55
56
57 I've considered encrypting my stuff.  I'm talking locked down from power
58 up all the way through.  Those who have been on this list a while and
59 know me, they know that would be a disaster.  If anything could go wrong
60 with it, it would. 
61
62 While I try to be secure, I'm not going nuts over it.  I do lock my
63 screen if I leave and sometimes even logout but I don't put hand
64 grenades and other booby traps around it.  Heck, if I did, I'd likely
65 trip up and hurt myself.  Ooops!!
66
67 I guess I'll just kept my top secret stuff in my head.  ;-) 
68
69 Dale
70
71 :-)  :-) 

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Linux USB security holes. "Taiidan@×××.com" <Taiidan@×××.com>