Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CORRECTION - Problem with eix-REMOTE update...
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:28:32
Message-Id: 4F8EA4E0.2070202@libertytrek.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CORRECTION - Problem with eix-REMOTE update... by Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
1 On 2012-04-18 7:08 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
2 <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de> wrote:
3 > On 18.04.2012 12:32, Tanstaafl wrote:
4 >> On 2012-04-17 12:21 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
5 >>> On 2012-04-17 1:41 AM, Vaeth wrote:
6 >>>> So if it is the differing versions problem, the solution is to
7 >>>> upgrade to the most recent (~x86) version of eix, currently
8 >>>> eix-0.25.3: echo app-portage/eix
9 >>>>>> /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords&& emerge eix
10
11 >>> Is this safe to do while remaining on the stable version of
12 >>> portage?
13
14 >> Anyone?
15
16 > eix-0.25.3 works great for me (incl. eix-remote) - if that's what
17 > you're asking.. ;)
18
19 No... I thought my question was very precise:
20
21 Is updating eix to an UNSTABLE version ok to do while leaving portage at
22 the STABLE version?