| 1 |
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> no, but with static exes you have to recompile everything |
| 4 |
> everytime a security bug is found. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
That's the job of the distro buildsystem. Ah, and that dramatically |
| 7 |
minimizes the chance that things break apart (i still remember |
| 8 |
the old times when libc updates tended to be dangerous). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> Oh - and didn't you just complain about bloat? Nothing means |
| 11 |
> more bloat than static binaries. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
As already said, all this under the axiom that libs are *small* |
| 14 |
and complex/redundant things are done by separate services. |
| 15 |
Perhaps you might have a look at Plan9 and how its done there. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
cu |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 21 |
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
cellphone: +49 174 7066481 email: info@×××××.de skype: nekrad666 |
| 24 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 25 |
Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme |
| 26 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Archives