| 1 |
2009/6/3 Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 03 June 2009 13:35:04 Mick wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Major build this morning of qt with a lot of blockers. Having |
| 4 |
>> unmerged a lot of packages to remove the blockers I am now emerging |
| 5 |
>> qt-core. I noticed this on my screen: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Determining system architecture... (Linux:2.6.29-gentoo-r5:i686) |
| 8 |
>> 32-bit Intel 80x86 (i386) |
| 9 |
>> 'i386' is supported |
| 10 |
>> System architecture: 'i386' |
| 11 |
>> Symbol visibility control enabled. |
| 12 |
>> Symbolic function binding enabled. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> This is the Qt/X11 Open Source Edition. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Since I have these in make.conf I would think that a package like qt |
| 17 |
>> would compile optimised code for my architecture, not just i386? |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> ARCH="x86" |
| 20 |
>> CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium3 -fomit-frame-pointer -msse -mmmx -pipe" |
| 21 |
>> MAKEOPTS="-j2" |
| 22 |
>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" |
| 23 |
>> CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" |
| 24 |
>> CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> Just curious. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> architecture != cpu type |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> in this case architecture is things like i386, sparc, mips, arm |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Hey! I knew that! |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Thanks :) |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Regards, |
| 38 |
Mick |
Archives