Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@×××××.at>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] what about my routing here ...
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 10:51:06
Message-Id: 5255350A.8020203@xunil.at
1 server:
2
3 # ip route s
4 default via 10.96.25.129 dev br0
5 10.96.25.128/25 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 10.96.25.131
6 192.168.1.0/24 dev eno2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.201
7
8 # !tra
9 traceroute 172.32.99.12
10 traceroute to 172.32.99.12 (172.32.99.12), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
11 1 ipfire (10.96.25.129) 0.410 ms 1.213 ms 1.302 ms
12 2 10.96.25.2 (10.96.25.2) 3.853 ms 3.835 ms 3.825 ms
13
14 ^C
15
16 on the router "ipfire" (which is 10.96.25.129 on its LAN-side)
17
18 # ip r s
19 default via 10.96.25.1 dev blue0
20
21 no specific routes on there
22
23 The route should go via 10.96.25.1 for targets in 172.32.99.0/24 as
24 well ...
25
26 I don't get where it gets 10.96.25.2 from *scratch*
27
28 This routing issue might be the problem with my libvirt-connections (see
29 other current thread).
30
31 Even when I do
32
33 # ip route add 172.32.99.12/32 via 10.96.25.1
34
35 on the router (explicit route for my desktop IP) the traceroute still shows:
36
37 # traceroute 172.32.99.12
38 traceroute to 172.32.99.12 (172.32.99.12), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
39 1 ipfire.mlp-ag.com (10.96.25.129) 0.294 ms 0.270 ms 0.258 ms
40 2 10.96.25.2 (10.96.25.2) 0.569 ms 0.746 ms 0.987 ms^C
41
42 Any hints on this?
43 I need a vacation, btw ;-)
44
45 And the best: I do this via ssh, so I am already connected ... which
46 means I get packages back ...
47
48 S

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] what about my routing here ... Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] what about my routing here ... Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com>