1 |
Mark Knecht wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Hi, |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> I recently switched to gmail. I did some searches to see how to disable |
7 |
>> or just make it so gmail's spam filter does not move anything to the |
8 |
>> spam folder. They don't work. Does someone here know of a way to get |
9 |
>> rid of this thing? It's getting on my nerves and I am even considering |
10 |
>> switching to Yahoo or something. I even thought about just marking |
11 |
>> everything it thinks is spam as not spam. Sort of mess up their stuff |
12 |
>> but if it works, may try it next. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> Thanks! |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> Dale |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> My experience is that it learns fairly quickly what's spam and what |
21 |
> isn't, but I have about 50 labels I created - different lists, family, |
22 |
> etc. for which I wrote simple rules. That keeps most stuff going to |
23 |
> the right place. I get about 30 spam a day which is pretty easy to |
24 |
> read through just once a day. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Works for me. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Good luck, |
29 |
> Mark |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
Thing is, I use POP not the webmail thing. I have a really slow dial-up |
35 |
and don't want to have to log in to get my email. I might also mention |
36 |
that I have a ton of false positives, about as many as is spam. I got |
37 |
my Seamonkey trained pretty well. It is VERY close to 100% dead on. |
38 |
Gmail is wrong more than it is right. |
39 |
|
40 |
Ideas? |
41 |
|
42 |
Dale |
43 |
|
44 |
:-) |