| 1 |
> -----Original Message----- |
| 2 |
> From: Graham Murray [mailto:graham@×××××××××××.uk] |
| 3 |
> Sent: 04 January 2007 14:05 |
| 4 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 5 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG! |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> "Nelson, David (ED, PAR&D)" <David.Nelson2@×××××××××××.com> writes: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> > Do you have it unmasked? My system is ~x86 and I have 1.4.6 and |
| 11 |
> > 2.0.1 (I think) but I'm not sure if these are officially the latest |
| 12 |
> > stable versions. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> How did you manage to have both 1.4.6 and 2.0.1 installed at the same |
| 15 |
> time? 2.0.1 has an RDEPEND '!<=app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.1', so should not |
| 16 |
> allow both versions to be installed at the same time. |
| 17 |
> -- |
| 18 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Erm I'm not sure. I think portage wanted to update 1.9.x to 2.0.x, and |
| 22 |
1.4.5 to 1.4.6 - but it doesn't like both on the same system. So if I |
| 23 |
remember correctly I think I removed 1.4.5 using emerge --unmerge, and |
| 24 |
updated 1.9.x to 2.0.x using emerge -uD gnupg or somesuch. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Then the next emerge -uD world I did I think it installed 1.4.6 for me. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I'll double check when I get home and make sure. I might only have 2.x |
| 29 |
but I thought I had both. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
David |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Note: These views are my own, advice is provided with no guarantee of |
| 34 |
success. I do not represent anyone else in any emails I send to this |
| 35 |
list. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives