Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: walt <w41ter@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: qt3support conflict
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:11:35
Message-Id: h27tlr$hft$1@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: qt3support conflict by Andrew Gaydenko
1 On 06/27/2009 07:24 PM, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
2 > On Sunday 28 June 2009 02:54:59 walt wrote:
3 >> On 06/27/2009 03:32 PM, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
4 >>> make.conf hasn't qt3support at all. Adding qt3support to qt-opengl
5 >>> shows... well... something horrible (see below) :-)
6 >>>
7 >>> //======================================================================
8 >>> emerge -pvDuN world
9 >>>
10 >>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
11 >>>
12 >>> Calculating dependencies... done!
13 >>> [ebuild U ] x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.2 [4.5.1] USE="glib iconv qt3support
14 >>> ssl -debug -doc -pch" 0 kB [ebuild U ] x11-libs/qt-test-4.5.2 [4.5.1]
15 >>> USE="iconv -debug -pch" 0 kB [blocks b ]<x11-libs/qt-test-4.5.2
16 >>> ("<x11-libs/qt-test-4.5.2" is blocking x11-libs/qt-assistant-4.5.2, x11-
17 >>
18 >> I recently went through the same thing on ~amd64 and emerge made me
19 >> uninstall every qt package before it would start building the updates. I
20 >> have no idea why, but everything finally came out okay.
21 >>
22 >> I'd say go ahead and emerge -C all of those qt blockers as emerge suggests.
23 >
24 > Walt, thanks! At my case portage has ovecome those blocks without direct
25 > unmerging.
26
27 Ah, I see portage wants to update my qt4 *again* today, and I see a new
28 package comment that emerging "qt" will pull in more qt sub-packages than
29 I probably want -- very true. So now I'm just emerging qt-core instead.
30 I hope it has everything that VirtualBox needs. I'll see.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: qt3support conflict Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>