1 |
On Monday, August 18, 2014 03:12:15 PM Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:21 PM, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
> > In cases like that I would do either of the following: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > 1) Run it inside a VM |
6 |
> > 2) run it inside a chroot |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > That way you can easily keep everything updated except for that |
9 |
> > application. |
10 |
> Or better still run it inside a container. Gives you most of the |
11 |
> benefits of both a VM and a chroot. It isn't as isolated as a VM, but |
12 |
> it is more isolated than just running the thing on your system. It is |
13 |
> also easy to bind-mount your home directory if that is helpful. A |
14 |
> container replaces the entire userspace, potentially including init as |
15 |
> well. So, as long as your kernel is compatible and you're not doing |
16 |
> anything too crazy with devices, this should solve your compatibility |
17 |
> issues. |
18 |
|
19 |
I should look into those. |
20 |
Just noticed there is also a libvirt driver for it: |
21 |
http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.html |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
> -- |
26 |
> Rich |