Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] depclean portect a class of ebuilds ?
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 21:08:32
Message-Id: 20150314210813.77c0a557@digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] depclean portect a class of ebuilds ? by James
1 On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 16:39:58 +0000 (UTC), James wrote:
2
3 > Ok, so I use this syntax (in make.conf) to protect gentoo-source
4 > kernels, as I like to keep kernel codes around for quite a while:
5 >
6 > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--exclude gentoo-sources"
7 >
8 > It works just fine.
9 >
10 > Today, I have many many ugly and hacked java projects
11 > on my "munge" system. I have spend countless hours hacking
12 > at java; so I do not wish for any dev-java codes to be removed
13 > by --depclean, but the others can be cleaned up.
14 >
15 > I have not been able to find a way to (inside of make.conf)
16 > to prevent these dev-java/* ebuild removals.
17
18 Why not simply create a set containing all the ebuilds you are
19 experimenting with?
20
21
22 --
23 Neil Bothwick
24
25 For security reasons, all text in this mail
26 is double-rot13 encrypted.

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: depclean portect a class of ebuilds ? James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>