| 1 |
On 10/13/2013 06:26 AM, shawn wilson wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> 1. The iptables-restore syntax is uglier and harder to read. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I don't get this - the syntax is *chain and then :tables (with |
| 8 |
> optional counters) instead of -N, and then a bunch of rules, and then |
| 9 |
> a COMMIT command (the only thing you don't get on the command line. |
| 10 |
> What am I missing or how is this uglier? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
That's not the syntax, because there is no syntax, but let's forget that |
| 14 |
point anyway because it's subjective. |
Archives