| 1 |
On Mar 30, 2013 9:48 PM, "Tanstaafl" <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> I should have added that this is for a server (not hardened), so I don't |
| 4 |
care about hot plug this or that, I just care about stability and |
| 5 |
reliability with respect to updates not breaking booting capability... |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> On 2013-03-30 10:39 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> On 2013-03-28 2:15 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> Just a thought. Have you thought about switching to eudev? That would |
| 13 |
>>> solve some udev issues. Since you are running a hardened profile and |
| 14 |
>>> servers, may not be a option tho. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> I'm curious... |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> Is eudev still being 'maintained'? Does it still have any advantages |
| 20 |
>> over the new udev? |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> I'm mostly concerned about getting so far behind that I end up in an |
| 23 |
>> untenable situation... ie, eudev dies in 1+ years, and the changes |
| 24 |
>> between now and then make it virtually to update to whatever is the new |
| 25 |
>> way... |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
All my servers use mdev. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
'nuff said. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Rgds, |
| 35 |
-- |
Archives