Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 06:23:01
Message-Id: 4477EEA2.4060108@mid.email-server.info
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow by "Hemmann
1 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
2 > On Friday 26 May 2006 21:28, Alexander Skwar wrote:
3 >> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
4 >> > On Friday 26 May 2006 18:13, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
5 >> >> Friday 26 May 2006 17:51 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin:
6 >> >> > ok, but still less to type ;)
7 >> >>
8 >> >> But esearch is more than twice as long as eix... ;)
9 >> >
10 >> > I am using search less, than syncing, so still a win, and it is only
11 >> > esea<tab> ;)
12 >>
13 >> Which is still 5 characters compared to 3 characters for eix :)
14 >>
15 > but eix-sync is still longer than esync (8 to 5) ;)
16
17 Nah, it's 5 to 5, so eix-sync is NOT longer than esync...
18
19 eix-<tab>
20
21 So, at best, eix is as bad as esearch, but normally eix is
22 faster to use - in every aspect.
23
24 Alexander Skwar
25 --
26 "May your future be limited only by your dreams."
27 -- Christa McAuliffe
28 --
29 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>