| 1 |
On Freitag 12 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:18:42 +0000 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> schrieb Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>: |
| 5 |
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:03:15 -0600, Roy Wright wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find |
| 7 |
> > > another desktop manager (even after being my primary desktop for 7 |
| 8 |
> > > years). |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > It's so mandatory it takes a whole mouse click to turn it off :( |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> If you do not want a piece of software, why should you install it? |
| 13 |
> Installing and not using it instead of not installing it at all, is the |
| 14 |
> wrong way and (to my opinion) it is defintely not the Gentoo way. |
| 15 |
> Well, I have drawn the conclusions and got rid of kmail and am on the |
| 16 |
> verge of migrating the whole desktop. I loved kde-3.5, I seriously |
| 17 |
> tried kde-4.*, but I could never befriend with it. And one point I |
| 18 |
> detaste is that "Social Semantic Desktop" thing (as Nepomuk is |
| 19 |
> characterized on its afore mentioned wikipedia page). For me it is just |
| 20 |
> another instance of what Kant called "selbstverschuldete |
| 21 |
> Unmündigkeit" (self-incurred immaturity). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
sure. Be able to tag and quickly find information is immature. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Question, when you have KDE installed and some app pulls in gconf or gvfs - do |
| 26 |
you throw the same temper tamtrum? |
Archives