1 |
Tom H <tomh0665@×××××.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> It looks to me like sysvinit-2.88-r7 was stabilized and the maintainer |
6 |
>> of apcupsd didn't notice. From the ebuild for apcupsd-3.14.8-r2: |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> DEPEND=" |
9 |
>> || ( >=sys-apps/util-linux-2.23[tty-helpers] |
10 |
>> <=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4 |
11 |
>> sys-freebsd/freebsd-ubin |
12 |
>> ) |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> What I suggest is copy that ebuild to your local overlay and update the |
15 |
>> DEPEND to <=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r7 and redigest |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> If that gives a correct update path for world, then file a bug against |
18 |
>> apcupsd. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Some commands were moved from sysvinit to util-linux, and these |
21 |
> commands are required by apcupsd and are included in util-linux if |
22 |
> it's compiled with the "tty-helpers" use flag. |
23 |
|
24 |
Is this somehow reflected in the dependencies? And how could I deal |
25 |
with the multiple versions of util-linux that seem to be required? |
26 |
|
27 |
Perhaps I should forcefully update util-linux and use tty-helpers so |
28 |
that apcupsd still works in case I reboot. But what other problems |
29 |
might that cause? |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
What am I supposed to think? Should we not update unless no problems |
33 |
are listed and just wait in case there are some, potentially having to |
34 |
wait indefinitely? How about security updates then? |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Again we must be afraid of speaking of daemons for fear that daemons |
39 |
might swallow us. Finally, this fear has become reasonable. |