| 1 |
On Saturday 04 Jun 2011 16:47:50 Indi wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: |
| 3 |
> > That is a example of Indi's headers when he was using usenet |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > References: <gZHrQ-5lZ-27@×××××××××××××.it> |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > <gZHLc-5Nq-5@×××××××××××××.it> |
| 8 |
> > <gZJ0B-84I-1@×××××××××××××.it> |
| 9 |
> > <gZVl7-3yX-7@×××××××××××××.it> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Can't believe I never noticed that Bastard Operator From Hell |
| 12 |
> reference in those headers, lol... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Well, I have to say that I still don't know if I'm looking at the same thing |
| 15 |
like you guys. See the attached screenshot. Indi's messages do not break the |
| 16 |
thread here and they look the same before and after the change she made. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
As Alan says it may well be Kmail being clever with threading, but my setting |
| 19 |
is already set to "Current Activity, Threaded" ... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
However, looking at gmane I can see Indi's messages after she changed her |
| 22 |
client were posted outside the thread. So I guess Kmail is being too clever |
| 23 |
for its boots and corrects the broken thread irrespective of the headers. o_O |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Knode (news reader) shows the threads broken and in a different order. |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Regards, |
| 28 |
Mick |
Archives