| 1 |
On 03/29/2013 09:27 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 29/03/2013 10:53, Norman Rieß wrote: |
| 3 |
>>> That is just evil. Have you no alternative to this ISP? |
| 4 |
>>>> |
| 5 |
>>>> |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> -- |
| 8 |
>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> Peter |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>>> |
| 12 |
>>>> |
| 13 |
>> Like free and open DNS servers? ;-) Like the one i am talking about and |
| 14 |
>> was told it was unnessesary crap? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> When you describe the service you DO get from your ISP, then we can see |
| 18 |
> that rolling your own is the proper alternative for you. Unless your ISP |
| 19 |
> block outbound port 53... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
It'd be trivial enough for someone in a saner spot to privately offer |
| 22 |
him an allowed-clients entry in a DNS server listening on a non-standard |
| 23 |
port. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Either way, it's still important he not allow just anybody to connect to |
| 26 |
his resolver. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> If you were in Africa, I could give you an alternative but sadly I don't |
| 30 |
> think you are in Africa |
| 31 |
> |
Archives