| 1 |
Michael Mol wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Mick<michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> You need portage-2.2 to be able to use sets. |
| 4 |
> Sadly, 2.1.10.11 is the latest marked stable for ~amd64. (Or was, last |
| 5 |
> time I synced.) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> It'll be nice when it's available, though. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I been using the unstable portage for a long time. Since I built this |
| 11 |
rig if I recall correctly. It works fine but it does get updated pretty |
| 12 |
regular. Zac is always adding some new frills and shiney things. ;-) |
| 13 |
I wouldn't blame you for staying stable but it works fine here on my |
| 14 |
amd64 and old x86 rig. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Dale |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
:-) :-) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
| 24 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |
Archives