Archives
Archives
| From: | daid kahl <daidxor@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] nfs home directory vs kmail | ||
| Date: | Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:01:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | 3ac129340911301301o155d560di80483614c8d7f61e@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] nfs home directory vs kmail by Mike Diehl |
||
| 1 | >> What nfs options are in use, both client and server side? |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > I used this fstab entry on the client: |
| 4 | > 10.0.1.1:/home /home nfs defaults 0 0 |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Using defaults you are auto-mounting at boot. But usually from my |
| 8 | experience items in fstab would be mounted before the network is |
| 9 | initialized. You could test this either by manually unmounting and |
| 10 | mounting it or turning off auto. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | But if you can see the files at all, it seems to say that it managed to mount. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Regards, |
| 15 | daid |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] nfs home directory vs kmail | daid kahl <daidxor@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] nfs home directory vs kmail | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |