Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kapshuk@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:36:00
Message-Id: CAJ1xhMUPUZ661Q6YScbHbbzeUTPxdiWXd_O50GDVMSf+ibvQjQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ] by Alan McKinnon
1 On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > On 16/09/2014 17:51, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
3 >> Recently, I updated xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager to version 1.3.1,
4 >> which is unstable, in order to prevent lvm2 from being pulled in as a
5 >> dependency.
6 >>
7 >> grep xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager /etc/portage/package.*
8 >> /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords:=xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.1 ~x86
9 >>
10 >> As I ran 'emerge -avuND @world' today, I got this output:
11 >> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
12 >>
13 >> Calculating dependencies ..... . .. ..... done!
14 >> [ebuild N ] sys-apps/sg3_utils-1.37 USE="-static-libs" 0 kB
15 >> [ebuild N ] sys-apps/rescan-scsi-bus-1.29 0 kB
16 >> [ebuild N ] sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools-0.3.2-r1 USE="{-test}" 0 kB
17 >> [ebuild N ] sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.109 USE="readline thin udev (-clvm)
18 >> (-cman) -device-mapper-only -lvm1 -lvm2create_initrd (-selinux)
19 >> -static -static-libs -systemd" 0 kB
20 >> [ebuild NS ] sys-fs/udisks-1.0.5-r1:0 [2.1.3:2] USE="nls -debug
21 >> -remote-access (-selinux)" 0 kB
22 >> [ebuild UD ] xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.0 [1.3.1]
23 >> USE="policykit udisks%* -debug -networkmanager -systemd (-lxpanel%)"
24 >> XFCE_PLUGINS="brightness -battery" 0 kB
25 >>
26 >> Total: 6 packages (1 downgrade, 4 new, 1 in new slot), Size of downloads: 0 kB
27 >>
28 >> emerge trying to downgrade a package, Is that a bug or feature? This
29 >> is the first time I've encountered it. I googled it as well, but so
30 >> far found nothing relevant.
31 >
32 > portage is doing what the ebuilds and make.conf tell it to do.
33 >
34 > For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local
35 > install needs but 1.3.0 does. So portage wants to make it so.
36 >
37 > Downgrades are not common, but neither are they unusual. It's not a
38 > feature either, it's a necessaity that portage be able to do this.
39 >
40 >
41 >>
42 >> The list's input would be appreciated.
43 >>
44 >>
45 >>
46 >
47 >
48 > --
49 > Alan McKinnon
50 > alan.mckinnon@×××××.com
51 >
52 >
53
54 Thanks for the explanation. I overlooked the fact that XFCE_PLUGINS is
55 a user-defined variable and didn't think to look for answers in the
56 xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager ebuild at the time.
57 The responses I got are certainly appreciated.