1 |
Mark Knecht wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 1:17 PM Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com |
5 |
> <mailto:rdalek1967@×××××.com>> wrote: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Mark Knecht wrote: |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > > As it is, I have several options. In a way, I wish I could tell |
10 |
> > > rsync to do 1st half of alphabet to one drive and then with next |
11 |
> > > command tell it to do the 2nd half of alphabet. That would likely |
12 |
> > > split the data in half for each one. |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > > You can do that, at least with a small kludge I'm sure. rsync supports |
15 |
> > > excluding directories and file names. As an example: |
16 |
> > > |
17 |
> > > rsync -avx --port=873 |
18 |
> > > --exclude={.cache,.nv,'google-chrome*',DiskImages} /home/mark |
19 |
> > > mark@truenas1:/mn |
20 |
> > > t/MyPool/mark/Backups/science/. |
21 |
> > > |
22 |
> > > There's a test open (?? -n maybe ??) that allows you to see what it |
23 |
> > > would do. |
24 |
> > > |
25 |
> > > I'm sure you can figure that part out. The above line is just in a |
26 |
> > > script file for me |
27 |
> > > |
28 |
> > > HTH, |
29 |
> > > Mark |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > In the directory I'm backing up, there is over 400 directories. That |
33 |
> > would be a LOT of --exclude options. Also, I would have to adjust the |
34 |
> > exclude options each time I added a new directory, which can be several |
35 |
> > a day sometimes. The word nightmare comes to mind. Loss of hair is |
36 |
> > also a thought. :-D |
37 |
> > |
38 |
> > I'm just glad I got a bigger hard drive coming. That's the easiest fix |
39 |
> > at the moment. |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> > Dale |
42 |
> > |
43 |
> > :-) :-) |
44 |
> |
45 |
> I have my movies in a directory called VideoLib and then |
46 |
> subdirectories A, B, C, etc. If you rearranged a little bit you could |
47 |
> subdivide your movies and use symbolic links to make it look more |
48 |
> flat. That sort of arrangement would mean 2 files with 13 excludes in |
49 |
> each for the movies. You could leave the rest alone, create a 3rd file |
50 |
> and exclude the top level movie directories. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> Anyway, I just wanted to provide an option. Only you know what works |
53 |
> for your work flow. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> Good luck, |
56 |
> Mark |
57 |
> |
58 |
> |
59 |
|
60 |
|
61 |
I did think about doing it that way but sometimes I can't recall the |
62 |
name of something I'm looking for and just have to scan down the list. |
63 |
Breaking it up that way would complicate the matter because I'd have to |
64 |
go look deeper. As time goes on, I'd have to break it up even more |
65 |
which would result in having to go even deeper. There may be a way to |
66 |
do it with linking or something but that could get interesting too. |
67 |
I've already got some divided up but even that causes issues sometimes. |
68 |
|
69 |
It's interesting, having all this data is neat but it can cause brain |
70 |
teasers to sort through. ;-) I'm still considering that Raspberry Pi |
71 |
thing tho. Small, power efficient etc etc. Lots of ideas. |
72 |
|
73 |
Dale |
74 |
|
75 |
:-) :-) |