Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Agg <aggelos@××××××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] off topic : Dolphin massacre in Japan
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:37:50
Message-Id: 45E20DD8.5050307@vergina.dyndns.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] off topic : Dolphin massacre in Japan by Dale
1 on 02/25/2007 11:50 PM Dale wrote the following:
2 > Agg wrote:
3 >> on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following:
4 >>
5 >>> Agg wrote:
6 >>>
7 >>>> on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
8 >>>>
9 >>>>
10 >>>>> It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
11 >>>>> about "spam" (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
12 >>>>> OMFG!!!) and write pseudo-humorous juvenile nonsenses. OP at least
13 >>>>> wrote something meaningful while all other of you "Responsible mailing
14 >>>>> list users writing every little topic into its little proper mailing
15 >>>>> list" just continue writing total nonsenses.
16 >>>>>
17 >>>>>
18 >>>> All those that replied wouldn't reply if it were an actual "spam".
19 >>>> An off-topic is not necessarily spam. And that's exactly the specific case.
20 >>>>
21 >>>>
22 >>>>
23 >>> Then exactly what does this have to do with Gentoo, Linux or even a
24 >>> computer?
25 >>>
26 >>>
27 >> *Nothing*. It was written on the subject: *off-topic*:...
28 >>
29 >>
30 >>
31 >>
32 >>
33 >>
34 >
35 > OK then. I'm going to start selling Viagra. I'll just put off-topic in
36 > the subject line and it will be OK. ;-)
37 >
38 > Doesn't make sense to you either now huh?
39 >
40
41 You don't have to look at the contents of a post that you think is spam.
42 But in the specific dolphin massacre case, those that look at it's
43 contents, will see that it is *not* about viagra or the like, and so, in
44 that case it's just off-topic.
45
46 --
47 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] off topic : Dolphin massacre in Japan Agg <aggelos@××××××××××××××.org>