1 |
on 02/25/2007 11:50 PM Dale wrote the following: |
2 |
> Agg wrote: |
3 |
>> on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>> Agg wrote: |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>>> on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following: |
8 |
>>>> |
9 |
>>>> |
10 |
>>>>> It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine |
11 |
>>>>> about "spam" (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG, |
12 |
>>>>> OMFG!!!) and write pseudo-humorous juvenile nonsenses. OP at least |
13 |
>>>>> wrote something meaningful while all other of you "Responsible mailing |
14 |
>>>>> list users writing every little topic into its little proper mailing |
15 |
>>>>> list" just continue writing total nonsenses. |
16 |
>>>>> |
17 |
>>>>> |
18 |
>>>> All those that replied wouldn't reply if it were an actual "spam". |
19 |
>>>> An off-topic is not necessarily spam. And that's exactly the specific case. |
20 |
>>>> |
21 |
>>>> |
22 |
>>>> |
23 |
>>> Then exactly what does this have to do with Gentoo, Linux or even a |
24 |
>>> computer? |
25 |
>>> |
26 |
>>> |
27 |
>> *Nothing*. It was written on the subject: *off-topic*:... |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> OK then. I'm going to start selling Viagra. I'll just put off-topic in |
36 |
> the subject line and it will be OK. ;-) |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Doesn't make sense to you either now huh? |
39 |
> |
40 |
|
41 |
You don't have to look at the contents of a post that you think is spam. |
42 |
But in the specific dolphin massacre case, those that look at it's |
43 |
contents, will see that it is *not* about viagra or the like, and so, in |
44 |
that case it's just off-topic. |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |