1 |
On Sunday 29 September 2013 14:45:05 Tanstaafl wrote: |
2 |
> On 2013-09-29 2:25 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > Tanstaafl wrote: |
4 |
> >> The way I see it, if you cannot provide a rational answer to that |
5 |
> >> question, then there is no reason for you to use this as a reason to |
6 |
> >> abandon gentoo, only a reason to merge /usr into /... |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Simple, I have never had to resize / or /boot before. I have had to |
9 |
> > resize /usr, /var and /home several times tho. THAT is the reason. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Ok, but... everything I've read and personal experience over the years |
12 |
> shows that space required for /usr should not change much, especially |
13 |
> constantly grow over time (like requirements for /home can and will)- it |
14 |
> may fluctuate (increase, decrease) *a little* over time, but it |
15 |
> definitely should not grow substantially, so, if you had to resize it, |
16 |
> most likely it is because you simply didn't allocate enough room to |
17 |
> start with. |
18 |
|
19 |
Then what would be a correct size for the "/" partition when putting "/usr" on |
20 |
there as well? |
21 |
I have had no issues with giving "/" 500MB, "/boot" another 500MB and have |
22 |
everything else with minimal values on LVM and extending partitions without |
23 |
rebooting the machine whenever necessary. |
24 |
If I am now forced to put "/usr" on "/", detailed steps on how to migrate all |
25 |
my systems succesfully with minimal downtime would be appreciated. Along with |
26 |
a size-indication that will: |
27 |
1) Always be sufficient |
28 |
2) Not be a waste of valuable diskspace |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
> > For me, it doesn't matter if it is rational to YOU or not. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Sorry, but rationality is not subjective. Just because something seems |
34 |
> to be rational to you doesn't mean that it is. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> You have still not stated a logical, rational reason for wanting a |
37 |
> separate /usr. |
38 |
|
39 |
Dale has, and so have I, see above. |
40 |
|
41 |
> > I am the one doing things on my puter not you or anyone else. If the |
42 |
> > init thingy fails, that will be me staring at a error message, not |
43 |
> > you. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> I don't want one of those things either, but that isn't what I was |
46 |
> questioning you about. |
47 |
> |
48 |
> Of course you can do whatever you want *and* are technically capable of |
49 |
> on your own computer, but that doesn't automatically make those things |
50 |
> logical or rational. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> I did see one good case for a separate /usr (someone who was using |
53 |
> ancient PATA drives, and something about striping for performance), but |
54 |
> that was obviously a corner case... |
55 |
|
56 |
Actually, it isn't a corner case. |
57 |
Striping increases performance, I use it as well. |
58 |
Why put all the software that I load when needed (and expect to be thrown out |
59 |
of memory when not used) on a single disk when you have the option to put all |
60 |
that on a RAID0 (striping) set? |
61 |
|
62 |
-- |
63 |
Joost |