| 1 |
On 7/22/06, Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Nick Rout schrieb: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > I wasted days getting NFS to not work. I switched to CIFS. It is working |
| 6 |
> very well. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Is file locking working over CIFS? How about permissions |
| 9 |
> and ownership? Working as well and easy as it does on NFS? |
| 10 |
> What kind of problems did you have with NFS - I'm asking, |
| 11 |
> as I can't think about anything easier than NFS on *nix. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Alexander Skwar |
| 14 |
> -- |
| 15 |
> I know how to do SPECIAL EFFECTS!! |
| 16 |
> -- |
| 17 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Alexander, |
| 23 |
i would say that NFS is the easiest if all of your UID's are the same for |
| 24 |
every user on the network, there is no reason that you would ever want mount |
| 25 |
it from the outside, through a packet mangling NAT with your normal |
| 26 |
permissions, and you have static IP's. that seems to be alot of conditions |
| 27 |
to me. I personaly would love to NFS+ that had some form of public key auth |
| 28 |
in it and encryption, yes i know you can do it with SSH tunnles, but still |
| 29 |
doesn't fix the permissions problem |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Andrew |
Archives